(Analysis) Much of Brazil’s resistance to U.S. actions originates with President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s Workers’ Party (PT). Lula defiantly declared, “I won’t take orders from ‘gringo’ Trump,” denouncing U.S. tariffs as “unacceptable blackmail” and rejecting interference in Brazil’s judiciary.
PT-aligned media amplify this framing as ideological aggression, not diplomatic pressure. Behind closed doors, influential Centrão leaders warn that escalating U.S. force sharply reduces the likelihood of granting amnesty to Bolsonaro-aligned rioters from the 2023 unrest.
They say prosecution is increasingly viewed as a symbolic backlash against Trump’s measures. Yet this defiant posture, they caution, could trigger a deeper economic and diplomatic spiral, ultimately risking Brazil’s stability.
On July 31, 2025, Trump’s administration imposed sanctions on Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, accusing him of spearheading “an oppressive campaign of censorship and politicized prosecutions” targeting Bolsonaro.
While Washington slapped a punishing 50% tariff on major Brazilian exports like beef and coffee—with only limited exemptions in place—about 35.9% of Brazil’s goods bound for the U.S. are now caught in this net.
With exemptions for key sectors, the measure still leaves Trump considerable leverage to tighten the screws further, amplifying the pressure on Brazil’s crucial export economy.
Brazil’s Elite Stuck in Outdated Narratives
Brazil’s elite continues to rely on stale assumptions shaped by Democratic-aligned institutions (CNN, The New York Times, others). They presume historical alliances still safeguard their interests—but global trends show otherwise.
Even the EU, Japan, South Korea, and India have effectively aligned with Trump’s policies, recognizing the cost of opposition. Appeals to former Democratic-era figures now hold little sway.
Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, once regarded as steadfast defenders of long gone norms, may themselves soon face scrutiny—highlighting that appeals to the authority of prominent Democratic-era leaders now hold considerably less influence.
Ian Bremmer (Eurasia Group) points out that this tariff crisis is “clearly political,” not economic. He warns that Trump is using tariffs as leverage over Brazil’s justice system and is deploying the full force of executive authority to do so (GZERO Media).
Meanwhile, IMF Deputy Director Petya Koeva-Brooks cautioned that additional U.S. tariffs would result in a steeper slowdown in economic activity, shaving up to 1.4 percentage points from GDP growth in 2025 (Reuters).
Venezuela’s Lesson: Why Political Defiance Matters for Brazil
Brazil’s current trajectory of escalating political defiance strongly resembles Venezuela’s past mistakes, offering a clear cautionary example.
Venezuela, once Latin America’s wealthiest nation, saw defiant leadership decisions set off a devastating chain reaction of economic sanctions and international isolation.
Understanding Venezuela’s descent—from prosperity to catastrophe—highlights the risks Brazil faces if it continues its confrontational stance toward Trump’s America:
- Chávez aligned closely with anti-U.S. regimes in the early 2000s, inciting political isolation.
- Oil price shocks (2014–2016) compounded structural economic weaknesses.
- From 2017 to 2019, increasingly repressive policies targeting political opposition led to a tightening wave of U.S. sanctions.
- These escalating measures systematically cut off access to international finance, effectively isolating the country from foreign lending and investment and deepening its economic crisis.
- In 2019, Washington recognized Juan Guaidó and seized Venezuelan assets abroad.
- By 2020–2021, internal repression, hyperinflation, mass migration, and sanctions culminated in national collapse.
Brazil’s Shifting Geopolitical Landscape
With Argentina aligning under Javier Milei and Lula doubling down on China and BRICS, Brazil may risk becoming expendable to U.S. strategic goals.
Its defiance is no longer a negotiation—it’s a provocation. Brazil’s current path positions it as a cautionary example for other Latin American nations daring to challenge U.S. supremacy.
A July 2025 PoderData poll showed 59% of Brazilians favor deeper trade ties with the U.S., compared to 32% favoring China.
This preference persists despite the concentration of Brazil’s export trade with China—suggesting public recognition that strategic ties with the U.S. may mitigate broader risks despite current tensions.
Conclusion: Brazil at a Crossroads
Brazil’s elite must urgently break free from dated narratives and illusions about Trump’s America.
Recently, President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva remarked that Trump was not elected to rule the world—yet this misses the point.
The United States remains the global hegemon, and its imperial reach endures regardless of who sits in the Oval Office.
Continued defiance—without diplomatic realism—risks echoing Venezuela’s downfall. The country stands at a critical juncture: adapt and engage, or isolate and collapse.
