[ad_1]
Press play to take heed to this text
GLASGOW — The true work has began on the COP26 local weather convention — and it’s all about confronting the carbon cheats.
World leaders dominated the primary few days on the Glasgow summit, however consideration now turns to negotiations on finalizing the Paris Settlement, with three key points but to be settled: deadlines, transparency and carbon markets.
These technical talks on the so-called Paris rulebook would possibly sound much less thrilling than flashy guarantees of net-zero targets, billions in funding or limiting world warming to 1.5 levels Celsius. Any settlement, nonetheless, is more likely to have far-reaching results.
That’s as a result of powerful guidelines on these three excellent points may cease international locations from dishonest their method out of decreasing emissions. Weak guidelines, in flip, danger weaker local weather motion. However talks on these points have dragged on for years, and getting all 197 signatories to agree is proving to be monumentally troublesome.
European Fee President Ursula von der Leyen mentioned final week that checking out the Paris rulebook is vital to local weather accountability, “to essentially present the world that we’re getting higher in combating local weather change.”
“How are we measuring success or steps ahead in slicing emissions? There are loads of percentages, loads of dates floating round,” she mentioned at a press convention.
Deadlines
Setting unified finish dates for local weather motion ought to — in idea — be the best job for negotiators: Nations simply must agree on a quantity.
The Paris Settlement requires signatories to submit local weather motion plans, known as nationally decided contributions (NDCs), each 5 years. However presently, the treaty units no particular deadline for the implementation of governments’ targets, making it troublesome to check international locations’ motion timelines.
The talks on the so-called frequent time frames revolve round setting a unified deadline of both 5 years, 10 years, or a extra versatile choice. Proponents of a tighter finish date say longer intervals danger locking in inadequate pledges for a decade.
Amongst opponents of a shorter time-frame are high-emitting international locations like Saudi Arabia and Russia. The European Union not too long ago determined to assist a five-year deadline.
Transparency
Aligning deadlines would make scrutinizing nationwide efforts simpler, and local weather motion extra constant. However international locations are additionally negotiating over stricter guidelines for reporting progress on decreasing emissions, and a few international locations are usually not eager on better transparency.
The talks on finalizing the Paris Settlement’s “enhanced transparency framework” will come right down to “how a lot flexibility do you give,” mentioned Tom Evans, a local weather diplomacy researcher at assume tank E3G.
“At what level does the pliability grow to be an excessive amount of?” he mentioned, “and then you definitely’ve type of undermined the transparency system, versus enough flexibility to truly allow the system to be practical.”
Growing international locations have to this point been given some slack, however below the brand new transparency framework, all Paris Settlement signatories are quickly meant to face common opinions and submit progress reviews to the United Nations. Many poorer international locations are asking for flexibility, given the extra bureaucratic burden, or monetary assist to scale up their reporting capabilities in return for signing as much as stricter guidelines.
Developed international locations have typically been pushing for extra stringent, unified guidelines, over issues that rising economies like China are usually not being sufficiently clear about their emissions knowledge.
China, for its half, has implied that capability-building help is a precondition for it to maneuver on transparency.
Carbon markets
The trickiest situation to seek out settlement on is components of the Paris Settlement’s Article 6, protecting guidelines on how international locations can obtain local weather targets through carbon markets. Governments have been negotiating for years with no breakthrough.
The concept is a worldwide carbon-trading system during which one nation may pay for emission reductions in a foreign country — similar to by funding a climate-friendly venture there — and depend these reductions towards its personal local weather objectives.
A functioning carbon market would, in idea, incentivize inexperienced investments and decrease the price of the transition for creating international locations. However permitting international locations to cheat the system may undermine your complete Paris Settlement.
There are two key sticking factors. Nations like Brazil and China maintain unsold carbon credit from the earlier, failed carbon market below the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, and need the pliability to promote them on any new world market.
Then there’s the danger of double-counting — if a rustic reduces emissions as a part of their very own local weather motion plan, however then additionally sells that discount on the carbon market to a rustic that additionally counts it as a part of their emissions stability.
“If one ton of CO2 is lowered someplace, it needs to be counted by one nation, not two or three or 4. That’s simply primary accounting, but it surely’s vital we put the suitable guidelines in place,” mentioned Gilles Dufrasne, coverage officer at Carbon Market Watch.
“We additionally must make it possible for the system goes to incentivize new initiatives and new emission reductions and never depend on credit and initiatives from the previous,” he added.
There are additionally different points complicating a carbon-market deal — susceptible international locations, for instance, are asking for a share of the revenues to go towards funding to assist them adapt to the altering local weather — and others need to embrace human rights requirements.
“It is a huge patchwork of positions and points. And that is what makes these negotiations actually advanced, not simply technically, but additionally politically,” Dufrasne mentioned.
Eliminating dishonest
Altogether, then, the Paris rulebook negotiations are about stamping out local weather dishonest — guaranteeing a clear strategy to decreasing emissions that tracks whether or not international locations’ actions truly match their phrases.
The “massive wins” in Glasgow would possibly come from elsewhere, E3G’s Evans mentioned, with talks ongoing about local weather finance, coal phaseouts and different efforts for extra formidable local weather motion.
However the consequence of the Paris rulebook negotiations will set the baseline.
“It’s extra about minimizing the dangers of a low-ambition Paris Settlement quite than truly securing excessive ambition,” mentioned Evans.
“Take Article 6. Good Article 6 guidelines don’t assure that international locations will tackle vital emissions reductions sooner or later — dangerous ones may imply that they’re undermined,” he added. “Good guidelines imply that we now have a foundation for ambition.”
Need extra evaluation from POLITICO? POLITICO Professional is our premium intelligence service for professionals. From monetary companies to commerce, know-how, cybersecurity and extra, Professional delivers actual time intelligence, deep perception and breaking scoops it’s good to maintain one step forward. E-mail [email protected] to request a complimentary trial.
[ad_2]
Source link