[ad_1]
A courtroom in Ahmedabad on Sunday remanded social activist Teesta Setalvad and former state director normal of police RB Sreekumar in police custody until July 2 in a case of fabricating proof to border harmless individuals in reference to the 2002 Gujarat riots.
The prosecution had sought 14-day remand of Setalvad and Sreekumar.
The courtroom of metropolitan Justice of the Peace SP Patel despatched Setalvad and Sreekumar, each arrested in reference to an FIR lodged on Saturday by the town crime department, to police custody until July 2, mentioned public prosecutor Mitesh Amin.
Setalvad had accused the police of roughing her up and bruising her arm when she was picked up on Saturday by the Gujarat Anti Terrorist Squad (ATS) personnel from her Mumbai house. She was introduced right here and handed over to the town crime department on Sunday.
Throughout the course of the listening to, she was taken to the town civil hospital for medical examination as per the courtroom’s course.
“The courtroom has stored the medical certificates in its file. We had demanded 14-day remand on the bottom that the 2 accused produced fabricated proof akin to affidavits. There’s have to interrogate them to know who their political masters are, because the apex courtroom noticed that the matter was politicised,” Amin mentioned.
Sreekumar was arrested on Saturday, and Setalvad on Sunday. Former IPS officer and accused Sanjiv Bhatt, who’s serving life sentence in a custodial demise case and is lodged in a jail in Palanpur in Banaskantha district, might be dropped at Ahmedabad on a switch warrant.
Town crime department had registered an FIR towards the three accused on Saturday, a day after the Supreme Supreme Court docket dismissed a petition difficult the clear chit given by the SIT to then chief minister Narendra Modi and others in 2002 post-Godhra riots circumstances.
Setalvad, Sreekumar and Bhatt are accused of abusing the method of legislation by conspiring to manufacture proof with an try to border harmless individuals for an offence punishable with capital punishment in reference to the 2002 Gujarat riots.
Whereas dismissing plea of Zakia Jafri, widow of slain former Congress MP Ehsan Jafri, the apex courtroom had noticed, “On the finish of the day, it seems to us {that a} coalesced effort of the disgruntled officers of the State of Gujarat together with others was to create sensation by making revelations which had been false to their very own information.” The trio has been booked underneath sections 468, 471 (forgery), 194 (giving or fabricating false proof with intent to acquire conviction of capital offence), 211 (institute prison proceedings to trigger harm), 218 (public servant framing incorrect file or writing with intent to save lots of individual from punishment or property from forfeiture), and 120 (B) (prison conspiracy).
The criticism drew upon paperwork of proceedings and different supplies to make out a case of cognizable offence towards them.
It took under consideration submissions made earlier than the Particular Investigation Workforce (SIT) fashioned by the Supreme Court docket to research the 2002 Gujarat riots circumstances and the Justice Nanavati-Shah Fee of Inquiry appointed by the Gujarat authorities.
[ad_2]
Source link